Position paper, 198–204 | DOI: 10.53260/EGO.202041
Reviews, 205–209 | DOI: 10.53260/EGO.202042
Case reports, 210–213 | DOI: 10.53260/EGO.202043
Case reports, 214–217 | DOI: 10.53260/EGO.202044
Original articles, 218–222 | DOI: 10.53260/EGO.202045
Original articles, 223–233 | DOI: 10.53260/EGO.202046
Original articles, 234–238 | DOI: 10.53260/EGO.202047
Original articles, 239–245 | DOI: 10.53260/EGO.202048
Original articles, 246–248 | DOI: 10.53260/EGO.202049
Original articles, 249–254 | DOI: 10.53260/EGO.2020410
Original articles, 255–261 | DOI: 10.53260/EGO.2020411
Recurrent uterine rupture in pregnancy after pelvic surgery
Abstract
Uterine rupture is a rare but life-threatening complication, for both the mother and the fetus. This event is usually linked to the presence of uterine scars which in the past were mainly caused by cesarean section surgery. Today the number of uterine surgeries has significantly increased and rupture events are now principally connected with laparoscopic myomectomy. We report the case of a patient with recurrent uterine rupture: the events occurred in two consecutive pregnancies. Years earlier, the woman had undergone laparoscopic myomectomy for removal of a single intramural myoma node. The first rupture event was an asymptomatic wall dehiscence discovered during an elective cesarean delivery for fetal breech presentation. The second happened during the third trimester of pregnancy and presented as a real emergency: in that case the patient suffered a complete uterine rupture and on ultrasound scan fetal parts were observed outside the uterine cavity in the abdomen.
Keywords: laparoscopic myomectomy, pregnancy, Uterine rupture, uterine scars
Citation: Benvenuti M.,Pancetti F.,Giannini A.,Russo E.,Simoncini T.,Mannella P., Recurrent uterine rupture in pregnancy after pelvic surgery, EGO European Gynecology and Obstetrics (2020); 2020/04:210–213 doi: 10.53260/EGO.202043
Published: October 1, 2020
ISSUE 2020/04
Position paper, 198–204 | DOI: 10.53260/EGO.202041
Reviews, 205–209 | DOI: 10.53260/EGO.202042
Case reports, 210–213 | DOI: 10.53260/EGO.202043
Case reports, 214–217 | DOI: 10.53260/EGO.202044
Original articles, 218–222 | DOI: 10.53260/EGO.202045
Original articles, 223–233 | DOI: 10.53260/EGO.202046
Original articles, 234–238 | DOI: 10.53260/EGO.202047
Original articles, 239–245 | DOI: 10.53260/EGO.202048
Original articles, 246–248 | DOI: 10.53260/EGO.202049
Original articles, 249–254 | DOI: 10.53260/EGO.2020410
Original articles, 255–261 | DOI: 10.53260/EGO.2020411