Editorial, 03-04 | DOI: 10.53260/EGO.202011
Editorial, 071–072 | DOI: 10.53260/EGO.202021
Short reviews, 073–076 | DOI: 10.53260/EGO.202022
Short reviews, 077–081 | DOI: 10.53260/EGO.202023
Short reviews, 082–089 | DOI: 10.53260/EGO.202024
Short reviews, 090–093 | DOI: 10.53260/EGO.202025
Case reports, 094–097 | DOI: 10.53260/EGO.202026
Case reports, 098–100 | DOI: 10.53260/EGO.202027
Short reviews, 10-15 | DOI: 10.53260/EGO.202013
Case reports, 101–104 | DOI: 10.53260/EGO.202028
Original articles, 105–110 | DOI: 10.53260/EGO.202029
Original articles, 111–115 | DOI: 10.53260/EGO.2020210
Original articles, 116–122 | DOI: 10.53260/EGO.2020211
Original articles, 123–126 | DOI: 10.53260/EGO.2020212
Original articles, 127–131 | DOI: 10.53260/EGO.2020213
Successful spontaneous pregnancies in a patient with mosaic Turner syndrome – Case report and review of literature
Abstract
Turner syndrome (TS) is a chromosomal abnormality resulting from complete or partial loss of an X chromosome, and it affects 1 in 2500 live born females. Most patients with TS undergo ovarian failure at an early age and are infertile. However, a minority of patients, especially those with a mosaic cell line, achieve puberty with a small amount of follicles and thus have a chance of conceiving with their own oocytes. Pregnancy in TS patients is associated with increased obstetric and cardiovascular complications.
We report the case of a mosaic TS patient with hypertension and autoimmune thyroid disease, who successfully conceived twice, each time with good maternal and neonatal outcomes. We also present a short review of the literature on possible pregnancy complications associated with this disorder.
Keywords: mosaic karyotype., pregnancy, Turner syndrome
Citation: Kruk K.,Zarzycka M.,Kruszewska J.,Krzywdzin´ska S.,Grymowicz M.,Smolarczyk R.,et al. Successful spontaneous pregnancies in a patient with mosaic Turner syndrome – Case report and review of literature, EGO European Gynecology and Obstetrics (2020); 2020/02:098–100 doi: 10.53260/EGO.202027
Published: April 1, 2020
ISSUE 2020/02
Editorial, 03-04 | DOI: 10.53260/EGO.202011
Editorial, 071–072 | DOI: 10.53260/EGO.202021
Short reviews, 073–076 | DOI: 10.53260/EGO.202022
Short reviews, 077–081 | DOI: 10.53260/EGO.202023
Short reviews, 082–089 | DOI: 10.53260/EGO.202024
Short reviews, 090–093 | DOI: 10.53260/EGO.202025
Case reports, 094–097 | DOI: 10.53260/EGO.202026
Case reports, 098–100 | DOI: 10.53260/EGO.202027
Short reviews, 10-15 | DOI: 10.53260/EGO.202013
Case reports, 101–104 | DOI: 10.53260/EGO.202028
Original articles, 105–110 | DOI: 10.53260/EGO.202029
Original articles, 111–115 | DOI: 10.53260/EGO.2020210
Original articles, 116–122 | DOI: 10.53260/EGO.2020211
Original articles, 123–126 | DOI: 10.53260/EGO.2020212
Original articles, 127–131 | DOI: 10.53260/EGO.2020213